A Thematic Unity for Heideggers Was Heisst Denken? :: Heidegger Was Heisst Denken Essays

A Thematic Unity for Heideggers Was Heisst Denken?ABSTRACT This seek is primarily an analysis of Heideggers Was Heisst Denken? I aim to provide a thematic unity for this enigmatic text, thereby rendering Heideggers thoughts on thinking more than available to those investigating the nature of human rationality and thinking. The procedure is to run into together some of the sundry themes and puzzling features resolved by unpacking this decry Most stimulating in our thought-provoking time is that we are still non thinking. The chief results of this study include the establishment of a global logic to the text, the identification of being-thoughtful as the proper phenomenon to be studied, and receptivity (listening for what calls for thinking) as the distinguishing discipline of the thoughtful. Perhaps it is a sign of the times that precisely this work, of all my publications, is the least(prenominal) read. (1)This remark by Martin Heidegger about Was Heisst Denken? is puzzling given that in the same interview he suggests that the around important issue facing us is the confrontation with what thinking is. If Heidegger is correct, then why does Was Heisst Denken? not rank among the most read of his works? Is it because we are unaware of the importance of encountering thinking? Because we conceptualise already to understand thinking (e.g., thinking is having thoughts)? (2) Either of these proposed explanations, it should be noted, would not startle Heidegger he anticipated them in Was Heisst Denken? An explanation that he does not consider, however, is that Was Heisst Denken? is itself puzzling and stands in some need of critical clarification.In this shew I present an analysis of Heideggers Was Heisst Denken? The aim is to provide a thematic unity for this enigmatic text, and thereby to render Heideggers thoughts on thinking more available to those investigating the nature of human rationality and thinking. I bear on by enumerating some of the puzzli ng features of the text, and included among them are the ambiguity deliberately built into the German title and the odd fact that Nietzsche and Parmenides take shopping centre stage in a series of lectures--which collected form the text--on thinking. The of import thesis of my analysis is that one particularly promising way of wake how the twenty-one lectures hang together is by unpacking this sentenceMost thought-provoking in our thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking. (3) This essay, then, is literally an analysis,