An Argument Against the Death Penalty :: Death Penalty Argumentative Persuasive Papers

An eyewitness to the execution of legerdemain Evans in Alabama describes this scene from the final arcminutes of a death penalty sentence being carried outThe first jolt of 1900 volts of electric automobileity passed through Mr. Evans body. It lasted thirty seconds. Sparks and flame erupted from the electrode tied to his leg. His body slammed against the straps holding him in the electric chair and his fist clenched permanently. A large puff of gray smoke and sparks poured out from under the hood that covered his face. An overpowering fetor of burnt flesh and clothing began pervading the witness room. Two doctors examined Mr. Evans and declared that he was not dead. It took three jolts of electricity and 14 minutes before fast one Evans was declared dead (Radelet, Facing the Death Penalty).Throughout history, various forms of executions such as this one have taken place as a punishment for crime. In 1976, the united States reinstated the death penalty by and by having revo ked it in 1972 on the grounds that it violated the Constitutions ban on unrelenting and unusual punishment (MacKinnon, Ethics 289). Since its reinstatement, the morality of such punishment has been extensively debated. I argue that the death penalty cannot be morally confirm on the basic grounds that killing a human being as a form of punishment is wrong.A major affirmation supporting capital punishment is that it serves as a deterrent to crimes - specifically, implementation. However, this stock requires that the would be killer would take at least a moment to consider what the consequences of murder within our legal system are. This assumes that the killer is able of such reasoning, and that the crime would be considered before it occurred. In fact, those who commit fiery crimes often do so in moments of passion, rage and fear - times when irrationality reigns (Information, Capital Punishment 107). Whether or not a murder or crime is premeditated, there are statistics exis ting that cause us to question how supportive an argument of deterrence can be. In 1989, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, seem before the Senate Judiciary Committee said that if we look at opposite Western democracies, Not one of those countries has capital punishment for peacetime crimes, and yet every one of them has a murder deem less than half that of the United States (Information, Capital Punishment 110). The Information Series on capital punishment also says that states that FBI statistics from 1976-1987 show that In the twelve states where executions take place, the murder rate is.